FDA Challenges Food Industry to Improve Risk Management, Quality Control

Article title
logo
Michael Causey, Editor & Publisher, eDataIntegrityReport.com

Michael Causey, Editor & Publisher, eDataIntegrityReport.com

The FDA continues to signal that food enforcement is back in fashion.

Last week at a press-only briefing the agency tried to demonstrate its proactive side, saying it was “taking steps to protect the public following the early identification of Salmonella Tennessee in one company’s supply of hydrolyzed vegetable protein (HVP) and again last week the agency issued an open letter to the food industry calling for more transparent product labels.

So what’s it all mean?

We spoke recently with Kim Egan, partner in the law firm DLA Piper’s Product Liability practice, and a regular source for us on these and other FDA-related matters.

“The food industry is facing a “perfect storm” — high-profile food-borne illnesses continue to plague the global supply chain, prompting President Obama to create the Food Safety Working Group, and the First Lady has declared war on childhood obesity, including a focus on food industry marketing to children, “junk” food in public schools, and the nutritional content of school lunches,” Kim points out.

I happened to see the harrowing film “A Perfect Storm” at my sister’s house last week and if I am an official in the food industry, an expert like Kim using “Perfect Storm” and “Food Industry” in the same sentence would get my attention.

Kim notes that President Obama said in a March 2009 weekly radio address that “At a bare minimum, we should be able to count on our government keeping our kids safe when they eat peanut butter.  That’s what Sasha eats for lunch.”

The Executive Memorandum announcing the First Lady’s Let’s Move campaign said that “[n]early one third of children in America are overweight or obese — a rate that has tripled in adolescents and more than doubled in younger children since 1980.  “Taken together, the new Administration’s focus on food has in turn pushed FDA to renew efforts to improve food safety and more aggressively enforce existing food labeling regulations,” Kim adds.

It’s all part of a more active FDA across the board, Kim notes.

“FDA has stepped up enforcement of existing regulations.  In August 2009, FDA reorganized its food oversight function and moved the Office of Foods into the Office of the Commissioner, giving food safety and food manufacturing enforcement greater visibility.  FDA appears to be focusing particularly on health claims made by food manufacturers, such as its recent warning letter to General Mills that it had no scientific evidence to support cholesterol claims on Cheerios cereal,” Kim adds.

As Kim explains, FDA said that the General Mills claims that Cheerios reduced cholesterol meant that General Mills was advertising Cheerios as a drug, an unapproved one at that.  FDA has also been focusing on health claims made by dietary supplements, the most notable examples of late being dietary supplement products that purported to be effective against the HINI virus.  There is an effort underway to improve front-of-label nutrition information for all food packages, and Senator McCain introduced legislation in February 2010 to strengthen FDA authority to regulate dietary supplements.

Congress has had food safety legislation in the works for a couple of years now.  Highlights of that bill include:

  • The Food Safety Modernization Act that is now making its way through Congress will require foreign suppliers to use “risk-based reasonably appropriate preventative controls” to prevent adulteration and reduce hazards.
  • FDA would be required to implement new food safety regulations within a year of enactment.  FDA would also have two years from enactment to “expand the technical, scientific and regulatory capacity of foreign governments,” which could include multilateral agreements and international harmonization of the Codex Alimentarius.  FDA would also be required to expend resources on foreign inspections.
  • Having said that, however, the majority of food-borne illness outbreaks since 2006 have been caused by domestic products or other products from North America , including fresh spinach, peanuts, jalapeno peppers, and tomatoes.

“In short, we can expect further pressure on food manufacturers to improve quality control,” Kim says.  “We can also expect continued pressure on food manufacturers to adhere strictly to promotional and nutritional labeling requirements, and we can expect those requirements to change in some possibly meaningful respects in the coming years.”

For more information, request “The New FDA Drive for Food Safety” paper here:

Showing 3 comments
  • Reply

    Thanks for being on top of this story. It’s a critically important issue.

    As you point out, there have been many serious food “recalls” lately (Is this Toyota’s fault too?), and people die when food is contaminated. USDA is doing a very poor job of minding the store. Of course they have resource issues too. But it’s good to see the FDA step up to the plate. They have historically done a better job of regulating food safety; maybe because they don’t have the relationships with producers that USDA has.

  • Reply

    Thank you for your comments. I agree with you that the agency has generally been more effective with food regulation. I wonder if some of the reason, too, is the heat they get on Capitol Hill when something goes wrong?

    I’ve also been advised to look more closely at European food regulations to see how those might inspire/impact the FDA’s approach. I’ll report back in this space.

    Thanks again for reading and offering your helpful input. MC

  • Reply

    Here’s a good blog entry (which features us toward the end) that interested parties might also want to checkout: http://www.blue-kitchen.com/2010/03/10/what-are-we-really-eating-and-whos-watching-it/

Leave a Reply